Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Anniversary of admission of Israel to United Nations: Ban Ki-Moon speech

United Nations General Assembly,
New York, NY
11 May 2009

Mr. President
Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen:

With each passing year, we come closer to our past. Every year brings with it momentous anniversaries of events that shaped our world. For example, we have recently marked the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II and of the United Nations itself. These two events, inextricably linked, form the basis of what we have come to know as the modern era, the post-war era.

For me, as Secretary–General, looking back on where the UN started and where it is now has a special importance, for I am now charged with guiding the world body through unknown and uncertain territory. “Terrorism” has long since replaced “arms control” and “d├ętente” as the focus of international security, yet the term defies definition. One country’s terrorist is another country’s revolutionary hero. Some insist that terrorists are opposed to democracy, but we have all seen democracies behave like terrorists.

In many ways, the world today does not seem to be very removed from the barbarity of world war. The invasion of Iraq has lasted longer than World War II, and more tons of bombs have been dropped on that poor country than all the bombs dropped in that great war. The International Declaration of Human Rights, so prized and venerated by men and women of honour everywhere, stands as an impotent relic of a forgotten time because conquest, cruelty, and arrogance are still with us and growing stronger.

For all of the good the UN has accomplished since its founding, and there have been successes, the sheer magnitude of human suffering and violations of international law that have occurred and are still occurring must also be taken into account.

Few people know that Israel is the only state to be given a conditional admission. Under General Assembly Resolution 273, Israel was admitted on the condition that it grant all Palestinians the right to return to their homes and receive compensation for lost or damaged property, according to General Assembly Resolution 194 paragraph 11. Suffice to say, Israel has never lived up to these terms, and never intended to.

For 60 years Israel has violated its terms of admission, and for 60 years the UN has done nothing about it. It has watched as Israel heaped misery upon misery on Palestine, and violated international law with impunity.

After “Operation Cast Lead,” no person, no country, no democracy can look at Israel without thinking of the inhuman slaughter and destruction committed by the axis powers in World War II, though one could have said the same about numerous past massacres. What atrocities might the world have been spared if the UN had refused to admit Israel 60 years ago?

Of course, the immediate post war world was a different time. The world had just witnessed the horrors of Hitler’s racist excesses, and collective Western guilt for the Holocaust dictated attitudes toward the idea of Jewish state. Even the UN could not withstand the moral pressure.

On Nov. 29, 1947, it passed General Assembly Resolution 181, “The Partition Plan,” to carve a Jewish state out of Arab Palestine. However, it was never ratified by the Security Council, and so does not exist in law, which means the UN played no role in the creation of Israel. Nevertheless, “The Partition Plan” was utterly illegal and a violation of the UN Charter, because the UN had no right or power to take land from one people and give it to another.

If it hopes to play a meaningful role in the 21st century, the UN must do more than simply promise to enact reforms. It must search deep within its soul to redress the fundamental violations of its founding principles, which have long since ceased to have any force. That recommitment must begin now, for it was 60 years ago today, May 11, 1949, that Israel became a member of the UN. The UN cannot hope to achieve any measure of peace or justice as long as it condones war crimes, which it does every day that Israel is allowed to flout its terms of admission.

The past cannot be undone, but the future can change. As its newly elected Secretary-General, I promise that the UN will no longer be a passive enabler of genocide. Therefore, I will ask the General Assembly to meet in special session at the earliest possible time to strip Israel of its membership.

Ordinarily, a motion to expel a member nation would have to come at the recommendation of the Security Council, but this is not an ordinary motion. Because Israel is in violation of its terms of admission, it is not a member in good standing, so the UN has every right to declare General Assembly Resolution 273 null and void. Since Israel’s membership depends on adherence to that resolution, its expulsion is automatic.

Essentially, the unavoidable, lamentable truth of the last six decades is that the UN has been a moral and political failure because it has refused to enforce its own rules and defend the Charter. Nothing the UN does can have any value as long as this illegitimate member occupies a place in the General Assembly. I want the UN to have value.

I count on your support...

( Comment: and who says cheats never prosper? )

7 comments:

  1. Did you also know that terrorism affects women more than any other demographic

    group?

    Please help us to stop terrorism by filling out a short survey at:


    http://www.johnmaszka.com/SURVEY.html


    I would really value your opinion and the opinion of your readers. The long-term goal of this project is to facilitate a more diplomatic American foreign policy in the years ahead.
    Thank you,

    John Maszka

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi all,
    Whilst I would like to believe that Ban Ki Moons statement to the UN General Assembly is real the reality is that as far as I can find out it is a hoax. There appears to be no record of it on the UN web site, nor on any site monitoring the UN. I guess that the truth is that BKM would never issue such a statement critical of Israel,s actions when he wil not even fully criticise them over Gaza.
    Pete Wilson

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes Pete, it's a spoof, but one I thought so well executed that I should put it up here. I hope I didn't get your hopes up too much, but if it makes you feel any better I got pretty excited when I first saw it - it just seemed so real. Alas, the reality is much more mundane and predictably spineless.

    Thanks for visiting and for taking the time to send a message.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "With each passing year, we come closer to our past", the text of Bank I Moon is a Hoax. The desinformation war, on the net, is largely in favour of propalestinians, anti-sionists and as usual, anti-semites. Actual history is purpously falsified.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bob, thanks for your comment. Would you like to expand on that?

    What history is falsified?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Is the rest of your stuff as false as the Ban Ki-moon comment? You should know that UN General Assembly resolutions are not binding. Have you researched the history of the middle East or are you just repeating what other people tell you?

    ReplyDelete
  7. All United Nations General Assembly resolutions carry a moral force. Israel is happy to cite UNGA 181. Aside from that, I'm not really sure what your point is.

    ReplyDelete